Menu
 |
 |
|
|
| Log In
|
|
|
|
|
| Search Web Pages
|
|
|
|
|
| Calendar
|
|
|
< September, 2010 >
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| 29 |
30 |
31 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
| 05 |
06 |
07 |
08 |
09 |
10 |
11 |
| 12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
| 19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| 26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
01 |
02 |
|
|
|
| pip
|
|
|
Notice to certain individuals on the VIP list
The few individuals being addressed here are in positions of considerable power and influence.
We are aware that you had no part to play in your name being included on this list. We have fought hard to establish and prove that many of the names on the list are of innocent individuals who became victims of either credit card fraud or being deliberately set up.
However it is a fact that while thousands have been raided and ruined by the police you and a few other individuals were considered by them to be worthy of exceptional treatment, in the form of protection. This may have apparently spared you from wrongful arrest and ruin, but it has in fact compromised you and by now you may be aware that as a result you have become a Jumping Jack of the police. Even if no favours have been asked of you, or you have given none, the moment it is revealed that your name was on the VIP list, your reputation will be ruined as no-one will believe that you were not protected because of your power, or, in a few cases, great wealth.
That the list is now in hands outside of, and hostile to, the police puts your reputation at great risk.
The purpose of this message is not to broadcast what may be obvious, but quite different and very specific.
Some of you (very few) are now coming under pressure to stop any action that could make it known that you have been compromised. In other words, you are being encouraged to assist the police in stopping any action against them that could damage your reputation also. If you do this, you will be committing an act of grave injustice – perhaps even an act of infamy.
You have a final opportunity to do something truly honourable. Speak up now and say that you were given protection against publication of a crime that you did not commit in the first instance and given protection that you neither wanted nor asked for.
The VIP list is explained below.
The VIP list
The American and British police have compiled a list of influential individuals who have been accused of being sex offenders, falsely or otherwise. Known as the VIP list, ‘very important perverts’, the individuals on this list have not been proceeded against by the police because they may be useful to them, or already are. The list is comprised almost entirely of men, although there are a few influential women on it whose men folk, husbands, sons or other family members, have been accused, thus creating the potential to compromise them also.
The majority of the names appear to be in influential positions in the media. The accusations range from mere allegations of sex abuse, not proceeded with, to allegations which resulted in police investigation, but were not processed on to subsequent trial, and allegations of possession of child pornography. All have the potential to ruin the named individuals, making the list a powerful device for compromising them.
One of the worst aspects of the list is that police or their agents can set up a desirable target – that is, some powerful person who could be useful to them – by organizing an allegation of sex abuse against them.
What is not clear is whether the police have informed all or most on the list that they have been identified as being ‘accused’ persons, although a few of the media individuals have published extremely biased opinions on the extent of ‘stranger danger’ and sex abuse, which could suggest that they are toeing a party line. If this is so, they are helping maintain a climate of fear that results in more resources going to police and child protection agencies.
The list also contains the names of senior politicians and of individuals who are extremely wealthy.
A question raised by the discovery of the list is whether it preceded the infamous Landslide list or was based on it. The Landslide list of ‘protected names’, was made up of individuals in high places, including the media, on the original list supplied to police forces around the world by the FBI, who were not proceeded against by the local police, at least not proceeded against in the UK. When that list was first mentioned, the police denied its existence but since the Operation Group Action acquired it they can no longer make such a denial. It is likely that the Landslide list bolstered an existing growing list of important individuals that could be compromised.
Examples of key individuals who could be compromised are executives of major social networking Internet sites now under pressure from agents of the UK police to deploy ‘stranger danger’ panic buttons on their web sites, all those responsible for financing the police and child protection agencies, and media opinion formers.
In addition, activists have acquired a few police files of influential individuals who were investigated by the police for specific offences involving minors. A threat to release some of these has already stopped police harassment of one group and attempts to shut down its web site.
The knowledge of the list, has finally given activists a means of counteracting some of the worst propaganda issuing from compromised individuals. For example one fanatical former public ‘scourge of child porn downloaders’ has been informed that his name is on the list and has gone silent.
The best way now for a child protection propagandist to get the attention of the activist group is to continue to publicly advocate stranger danger or promote witch hunt policies. It is expected that the group will shortly have a mechanism for the public to report hitherto unreported accusations against such grandstanders. It seems that predator chasers are either real or potential predators themselves or already hopelessly compromised by the police.
‘To catch a predator’ was a popular pastime - of ‘past’ time. We shall now see how popular a new one will be. It could be called ‘To expose a hypocrite’.
Created on 02/12/2010 12:20 PM by Editor
Updated on 03/23/2010 03:05 PM by Editor
|
|
|
|
|
