Inquisition 21
 |
 |
|
|
| Log In
|
|
|
|
|
| Search Articles
|
|
|
|
|
| Comments
|
|
|
You don't have to,
but if you log in,
you can add comments.
|
| Page Referral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation Ore News and evidence
|
|
|
|
The collapse of Operation Ore and its fallout
The dirty tricks campaign against the messengers
As the group exposing the frauds of Operation Ore expands, the ‘dirty tricks’ increase. These will be detailed at the right time, probably after there has been a properly authorised review or inquiry, but some small idea of what has been going on will now be given here.
The first, which is so ‘normal’ for the police that it probably should not be included in a special category, was the UK police, probably the National Crime Squad, using both tabloids and a website that pretends to be managed by an independent individual to discredit and slander some of the individuals involved in the fight.
Next, even more seriously, and details of this still cannot be fully spelt out, was the police intimidating, and taking certain actions against, certain individuals.
Also most serious was the sending of explicit child pornography to key individuals who were central to the fight against Operation Ore and who had collected much of the evidence of the police corruption used in it. They believe that this material came from both the British police and the FBI, and so good now are some of the resources and expertise acquired by the group that they are involved in that they have a fair idea of its origins.
Above all, this last episode illuminates the dangers of the empowerment of the police through child pornography, the police state it has given rise to, and the Prohibition-type racketeering it has generated. Let’s look first at the predicament of the people trying to resist this evil process. This web site urges people who accidentally or otherwise receive child pornography not to report it to their local police as those police are likely both to seize their PCs and leak this fact to the media. Also, because the vast proportion of child pornography still available is in the hands of the police who are using it legally for stings and illegally, as in this case, to harass and intimidate and possibly trap individuals who are trying to expose them
So, here we have a group of individuals in the UK, with one or two outside the country, who have this evidence of criminal activity and cannot use it, because the law forbids them to use it, in either their own defence or in attempts to expose the criminals sending it. If they suspect, or know, that the police have sent it, they are completely powerless. But one of the individuals in question in the UK who has received it is no ordinary person, indeed some would call him recklessly courageous, so he has first deleted the images and then sent in the details of the email, together with his evidence of origins to the police, and what has happened? You guessed it – nothing!
If anyone thinks this is exaggerated, let us add that these same people have been refused a hearing both by the National Crime Squad and the Independent Police Complaints Authority.
This is the state of democracy in Great Britain today.
Why the FBI?
We have evidence that the FBI has been emailing child porn to UK citizens. The FBI has been using a server bank, sometimes called a ‘server farm’ – that is a group of computers, possibly under one roof, as a hosting location.
The FBI appears to be targeting some individuals who have been writing critically about the British police, especially about their handling of Operation Ore. An additional reason for the US interest is that these criticisms are exposing frauds in the handling of the Landslide case back in the US.
We believe that the intention of the British police is to pounce on certain individuals who have been set up thus by the FBI. The British police can claim that they did not plant any evidence.
We have heard from some individuals who have been targeted. but would like to hear from as many others affected as possible.
If any reader thinks that it is fanciful to suppose that the FBI is interested, last year a US prosecutor issued subpoenas to US citizens to obtain original versions of encrypted emails between them and the editor of Inquisition21. She, the prosecutor, could not subpoena the editor as he lives in Ireland. The US attorney of one of the US citizens revealed that the subpoenas had resulted from FBI surveillance.
Operation Ore News and evidence
The original false evidence
We dispute the above and present the new evidence
Examples of fraud in Operation Ore
The dirty tricks campaign against the messengers
The complaints and allegations of corruption against the police.
 |
|
|
